ext_42763 ([identity profile] flippet.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] flippet 2011-03-10 02:37 pm (UTC)

I don't know, I find it very hard not to think he deserved her to wait until he was Vicodin free again to decide whether or not he was good for her, but that's only because I would have done it for anyone I loved.


See, this is so much of it.

I can understand her wanting to put things on hold until he had gotten himself together. She's even entitled to choose NOT to deal with this.

But to know that he'd *just* fallen off the wagon, and do this?

It's like, 'oh, you were so afraid of losing me that you threw sobriety away - hey, here's your prize, now you get to lose me anyway! Hope you've got more of your stash on hand!'

Really. She's got to know that dumping him like that would drive him right back into the arms of the pills. Which he likely had more of.

I'm with you - she couldn't wait until he at least had a support net in place? She couldn't demand he hook up with therapy first? Even if she still intended to end it - cutting him loose into free fall seems awful, to me.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting